Independent reference. Not affiliated with HM Courts & Tribunals Service, the Judiciary of England and Wales, or the Ministry of Justice.

England & Wales · Scotland · Northern IrelandCourt Judiciary
Guidance

CJC Costs review consultation responses

Published 2023-05-09Last updated 2023-05-12

Documents

1 – Checkmylegalfeescom CJC Costs Consultation Response PDF (PDF)
2 – Alan Tunkel – CJC Costs Consultation Response (PDF)
3 – HHJ Philip Glen (individual) response (PDF)
5 – Expert Witness Institute response CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
7 – Legal and Risk Services response to CJC consultation (PDF)
8 – A SAGGERSON – COSTS BUDGETING CONSULTATION SUBMISSION 14 SEPTEMBER 2022 (PDF)
9 – Medical Protection Society response CJC consultation costs (PDF)
10 – County Court at Central London & Mayor’s & City – RESPONSE TO THE CJC (PDF) 11 – TCC Response to CJC Working Group Consultation (PDF)
12 – The Commercial Court Judges – CJC Costs consultation (PDF)
13 – HHJ David Hodge KC (individual) – Costs Consultation Submission (PDF)
16 – Zurich Insurance response CJC costs consultation (PDF)
17 – CILEX – Chartered Institue of Legal Executives Response to the CJC Costs Working Consultation 30-09-2022 (PDF)
17a – CILEX – Costs belsner (PDF)
18 – Sarah Bingham (Slater Gordon) SG Response to CJC Costs Consultation Paper – June 2022 (PDF)
19 – Civil Court Users Association CCUA response CJC Costs Working Group v1 (PDF)
20 – Council of Circuit Judges Costs Consultation Submission(CoCJ) (PDF)
21 – GowlingWLG UK LLP Costs Review Submission (PDF)
24 – Fletchers Group – Fletchers Solicitors Costs Consultation Responses 07.10.2022 (PDF)
25 – 114141710622 – Association of Consumer Support Organisations (ACSO) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
25a – ACSO – Belsner Response FINAL (PDF)
27 – Kain Knight – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
28 – Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
28a – Association of Personal Injury Lawyers – Belsner Additional Consultation (PDF)
29 – Association of Medical Reporting Organisations -CJC Costs (PDF)
30 – Disputes Efiling (DE) – Costs Consultation Response (PDF)
30a – DisputesEfiling Tony Guise – CJC Belsner response (PDF)
31 – Julie Skinner – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
32 – Pensions Litigation Court Users Committee – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
33 – Keoghs LLP – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
36 – Alan Johnson – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
38- Action Against Medical Accidents (AVMA) Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
38a – AvMA Implications Belsner (PDF)
39 – Intellectual Property (IP) Lawyers Association (IPLA) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
41 – Hogan Lovells International LLP – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
42 – Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
43 – Clifford Chance – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
44 – Islington Law Centre – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
45 – Dominic Hughes – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
46- London Solicitors Litigation Association CJC Costs (PDF)
48 – Association of HM District Judges – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
48a – Association HM DistrictJudge CJC-Costs-Consultation-Belsner (PDF)
49 – Irwin Mitchell LLP – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
50 – JUSTICE CJC Costs Consultation Response October 2022 FINAL (PDF)
51 – The Law Society for England and Wales – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
52 – CMS – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
53 – Association of British Insurers (ABI) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
54 – Housing Law Practitioners Association (HLPA) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
55 – Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
57 – Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
57a – FOIL CJC-Costs-Consultation-Belsner (PDF)
58 – Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
59 – Springfield Advice and Law Centre (SALC) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
60- Acumension Limited – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
61 – Intellectual Property (IP) Bar Association (IPBA) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
62 – NHS Resolution – Response to CJC Costs v2 FINAL (PDF)
63 – Kennedys Law – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
64- IP Federation (IPF) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
66 -Capsticks LLP – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
69 – ILESH CHANDARANA- Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
72 – Hill Dickinson LLP – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
73 – Jason Rowley – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
75 – Cost Law Services – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
76 – City of London Law Society Litigation Committee (CLLSLC) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
77 – BAr Council and PIBA – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
78 – Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors (FOCIS) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
80 – DWF response to CJC Costs Consultation – 14 Oct 2022 (PDF)
80a – DWF – Nicola Critchley – Belsner consultation (PDF)
81 – Weightmans LLP – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
84 – Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
84a – Association of Costs Lawyers – Belnser Consultation (PDF)
89 – Law Centres Network – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
90 – Birmingham LAw Society – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
91 – Underwood Solicitors – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
93 – News Media Association (NMA) – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
96 – NFU mutual – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
97 – Timothy Fancourt J – Response to CJC Costs Consultation (PDF)
99 – PNLA – Katy Manley – Costs Consultation (PDF)
100 – Benjamin Williams – CJC-Costs-Consultation-Belsner (PDF)