CPR Part 1
Overriding Objective
Read CPR Part 1 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Guidance that cites this 4
Judicial guidance and court guides containing an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one against its source.
- GuidancePilot Practice Note (revised): Listing and transfer of cases from the Insolvency and Companies Court to the County Court at Central Londonupdated 2026-03-12
cited asCPR 1.1
…and Judges in the County Court at Central London shall have regard to CPR 1.1 and the following factors: 4.1. The complexity of the proceedings;…
- GuidancePilot Practice Note (revised): Listing and Criteria for Transfer of Work (2024)updated 2024-12-23
cited asCPR 1.1
…and Judges in the County Court at Central London shall have regard to CPR 1.1 and the following factors: 4.1. The complexity of the proceedings; 4.…
- Judiciary pageCourts and Workupdated 2022-11-15
cited asCPR 1.5
…Wales the Welsh language may be used by anyone wishing to use it. By CPR 1.5(2) parties are required to assist the court to put into effect those…
- GuidancePractice Statement: Listing of Cases for Trial in the Patents Courtupdated 2022-09-26
cited asCPR rule 1.1
…ealing with cases justly and at proportionate cost in accordance with CPR rule 1.1. This may have the effect of setting limits on hearing times that ena…
Judgments citing this Part 42
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentXB -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-05-11anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 1.1
- JudgmentTSE -v- Youssef Dahan (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-12-09anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1.4
- JudgmentTSE -v- Youssef Dahan (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-11-05anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1.4
- JudgmentSandor-Laszlo Pal and others -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-07-10anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Part 1
- JudgmentQRS -v- The Chief Constable of Essex Police (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-04-30anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentAAR -v- London Borough of Croydon & another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-05-01anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentFER -v- SHE (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-02-21anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1.1
- JudgmentBBG -v- Persons Unknown (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-02-21anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.1.4
- JudgmentAB -v- London Borough of Waltham Forest (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-01-29anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentSRU -v- GBT (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-11-24anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentGJA -v- The Sea Cadet Association (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-11-09anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentAXB -v- Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-11-09anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentJXH -v- The Vicar and others (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-10-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentAKS -v- The Governing Body of St Paul's School for Girls (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-09-28anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentBCD -v- G4S (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-07-25anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentJXH -v- The Vicar, Parochial Church Council And Churchwardens Of The Parish Church Of Holocombe Rogus (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-06-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentSRU -v- GBT (striking out order) (opens the source site)2023-01-02
cited asCPR1.1
- JudgmentLXB -v- Mr John Ridley (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-11-16anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentCommittal for Contempt of Court: Stringer -v- Potgieter (opens the source site)2022-10-10
cited asCPR Part 1
- JudgmentLHX -v- The London Borough of Newham and another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-10-07anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 1.4
- JudgmentBEA and another -v- Motor Insurers’ Bureau (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-07-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1.1
- JudgmentTAA -v- MSA (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-05-23anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1.1
- JudgmentYXA -v- Lancashire County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-05-23anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentSXJ -v- Martin (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-05-04anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentPXO -v- Mulsanne Insurance Company Ltd (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-04-25anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentAXB -v- The Ministry of Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-02-11anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentMSW -v- London Borough of Tower Hamlets (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-09-02anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentIEA -v- OOE (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-08-02anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentCAX -v- John Radford (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-07-27anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentFTB - v- Busuttil (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-04-27anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentSAT - v - MIND (The National Association for Mental Health (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-01-27anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentRTT -v- Telefonica UK Limited (anonymity) (opens the source site)2021-01-08anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentABC, BCD, CDE and DEF -v- London Borough of Croydon (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-12-30anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentABC -v- DEF (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-12-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentPAA -v- Williams (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-11-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentMJN -v- Skipwith (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-11-10anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentTDZ -v- London Borough of Lambeth (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-10-14anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentTDZ -v- London Borough of Lambeth (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-10-08anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentTDZ -v-London Borough of Lambeth (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-10-07anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentRTX -v- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-09-24anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentRTX -v- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust(anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-09-04anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1
- JudgmentWAB -v- Richard John Hickson (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2020-05-28anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 1998 rules 1.1