CPR Part 3
The Court's Case Management Powers
Read CPR Part 3 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Guidance that cites this 5
Judicial guidance and court guides containing an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one against its source.
- GuidanceJudgment summaries for the Commercial Courtupdated 2026-09-29
cited asCPR rule 3.1
…the Second Defendant (Party C). The application was made pursuant to CPR rule 3.1(2)(g). The stay was sought to allow Party A to pursue a challenge u…
- Guidance2025 judgment summariesupdated 2026-03-17
cited asCPR 3.1
…it would be wrong to sidestep that principle by making an order under CPR 3.1(5), and in event inappropriate in all the circumstances to make such…
- Judiciary pagePre-Action Protocols (PAPs)updated 2025-02-10
cited asPart 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules
…ction on Pre-Action Protocols and suggest that this should supplement Part 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The CJC is made these proposals jointly with Her Majesty’s Courts…
- Judiciary pageChancery Judgmentsupdated 2025-01-14
cited asCPR r. 3.3
…nsions of time had been wrongly granted and should be set aside under CPR r. 3.3(5); or, alternatively, that their addition as a party (after the limi…
- Judiciary pageJudgmentsupdated 2023-11-07
cited asCPR 3.4
…not to have challenged the amendment under CPR 17.2, but rather under CPR 3.4, such that the 14 day period specified in CPR 17.2(2) did not apply.…
Judgments citing this Part 105
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. Showing the most recent 50 of 105. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentDD -v- Ministry of Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals Service (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-07anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules 3.3
- JudgmentTR -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-07-08anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentLEE -v- London Borough of Hounslow and West London Family Court (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-06-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentHGS -v- Manchester City Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-03-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentHFS -v- His Majesty’s Passport Office (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-03-05anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentFRY -v- Defence Secretary (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-02-11anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentILP -v- Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-01-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.9
- JudgmentPAL -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-12-22anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.9
- JudgmentERD -v- London Borough of Hounslow (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-12-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.3.1
- JudgmentKZT -v- The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-11-26anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCivil Procedure Rules, Part 3
- JudgmentBeijing Songxianghu Architectural and another -v- Kitty Kam (opens the source site)2025-11-07
cited asCPR 3.4
- JudgmentKDP and another -v- TXL and UK Insurance (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-10-14anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Part 3
- JudgmentBCY -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-09-24anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.8
- JudgmentBLA -v- Shropshire Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-09-02anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentCDO and CDR -v- The Director of Public Prosecutions (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-08-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentPMC -v- A local health board and others (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-07-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentSK -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-07-03anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r. 3.1
- JudgmentMG -v- The Secretary of State for Justice (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-06-26anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.9
- JudgmentBYB -v- London Borough of Hounslow (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-06-26anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.3.1
- JudgmentRKT -v- The Secretary of State for Defence (consent order) (opens the source site)2025-06-16
cited asCPR3.1
- JudgmentJT -v- Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-06-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentMOS -v- Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-06-03anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentIRY -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-05-23anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentCKT -v- The Office of the School Adjudicator (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-04-04anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentCKT and another -v- Twyford Church of England Academies Trust and another (anonymity order and application for judicial review) (opens the source site)2025-03-21anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentAXZ -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-01-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentCrypto Open Patent Alliance -v- Wright (order) (opens the source site)2024-12-20
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentAGA -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-12-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentH6 -v- Special Immigration Appeals Commission (order) (opens the source site)2024-12-13
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentTPL1 -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-12-11anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentMSK -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-11-25anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r. 3.1
- JudgmentAXB -v- RJE and the Ministry of Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-10-01anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentSecretary of State for the Home Department -v- Special Immigration Appeals Commission (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-07-26anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r. 3.1
- JudgmentZX -v- Bath & North East Somerset Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-07-22anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR rule 3.1
- JudgmentFXA -v- Secretary of State for Defence and another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-07-04anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r. 3.1
- JudgmentGM -v- Surrey County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-06-10anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r. 3.1
- JudgmentAR -v- Secretary of State For Justice (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-05-14anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r. 3.1
- JudgmentTaylor and others -v- Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-05-09anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR3.3
- JudgmentAAR -v- London Borough of Croydon & another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-05-01anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR3.3
- JudgmentXY -v- Brighton and Hove City Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-04-24anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r. 3.1
- JudgmentDepartment for Education -v- Annette Hercules (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-04-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentFull Colour Black Limited -v- The artist known as "BANKSY" and others (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-03-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.3.10
- JudgmentCompetition and Markets Authority -v- The Competition Appeal Tribunal (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-12-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR, r.3.1
- JudgmentAK -v- Westminster City Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-12-01anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.3.1
- JudgmentSRU -v- GBT (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-11-24anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR3.3
- JudgmentAXB -v- Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-11-09anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3
- JudgmentAHZ -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-10-06anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r. 3.1
- JudgmentAnna Castle and XYZ -v- NHS England (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-10-03anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentAnna Castle and another -v- NHS England (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-09-29anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.1
- JudgmentEXE and another -v- City of Bradford MDC (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-09-28anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 3.3