CPR Part 32
Evidence
Read CPR Part 32 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Judgments citing this Part 7
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentBeijing Songxianghu Architectural and another -v- Kitty Kam (opens the source site)2025-11-07
cited asCPR 32.12
- JudgmentAB -v- Secretary of State for Defence and others (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-07-29anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 32.13
- JudgmentDC KSO -v- The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-12-29anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 32.13
- JudgmentPrior and others -v- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Minute of Order) (opens the source site)2021-06-21
cited asCPR 32.13
- JudgmentDXM -v- Grimes and The Motor Insurers' Bureau (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-04-30anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 32.2
- JudgmentSNV -v- Khayyat (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2020-06-02anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 32.12
- JudgmentAndrew Greystoke -v- The Financial Conduct Authority (privacy order) (opens the source site)2020-04-28
cited asCPR 32.13
No guidance in our index cites this instrument by name. That is an absence in the cross-reference layer, not a statement that none exists — a document referring to it only as “Part 32” without naming its rulebook is deliberately not matched, because that reference is ambiguous across the three rulebooks.