CPR Part 39
Miscellaneous Provisions Relating to Hearings
Read CPR Part 39 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Guidance that cites this 3
Judicial guidance and court guides containing an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one against its source.
- GuidancePre-inquest review hearingsupdated 2026-06-25
cited asCPR 39.8
…odied in the Coroners Rules, it reflects the Civil Procedure Rules at CPR 39.8 (external link) . [3] per Fordham J in Bell v Brabners LLP [2021] E…
- GuidancePractice Guidance - Anonymisation of Parties to Asylum & Immigration cases in the Court of Appealupdated 2022-07-06
cited asCPR 39.2
…from this principle will need to be justified. The Court will apply CPR 39.2(4) which provides that the court must order that the identity of a pa…
- GuidancePractice Direction on Video or Audio Hearings in Civil Proceedings during the Coronavirus Pandemicupdated 2022-07-06
cited asCPR 39.2
…rovisions of this PD in addition to the bases for doing so set out in CPR 39.2. Where such an order is made under the PD the provisions in CPR 39.2(…
Judgments citing this Part 5,242
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. Showing the most recent 50 of 5,242. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentPLG -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-10-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentPPT -v- Independent Television News Limited and Guardian News and Media Limited (anonymity and reporting restrictions order) (opens the source site)2026-10-07anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentPSH -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-09-30anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentPNS -v- Home Secretary (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-09-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentEGH -v- Manchester City Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-09-03anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentEBM and Nicole Miranda -v- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentCXD -v- Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentMPL and others -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentHOM -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentZYX -v- Peterborough City Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Rule 39.2
- JudgmentDJT -v- The Hesley Group (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Rule 39.2
- JudgmentGTV -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentRDS -v- Cambridgeshire County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentCZX -v- The Estate of VBY and another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentAHL -v- London Borough of Barking and Dagenham and Lancashire County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentNYQ -v- Colin Fotheringham and Esure (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentNational Crime Agency -v- GKC (No.4) (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentGHJ -v- West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust and Dr Nadeem Shaida (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentKYA -v- AIG UK Ltd (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentAsim Khalid -v- The Chief Constable of Manchester Police (anonymity and special measures order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Rule 39.2
- JudgmentCDE -v- Halton Borough Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentDJO -v- Oakhill College (Whalley) (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentMKR -v- Cloudflare and others (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentMouakoumba -v- London Borough of Camden (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentMLM -v- Ealing London Borough Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentMTS -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentINP -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentCTY -v- LQS (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r 39.2
- JudgmentWXC -v- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentADG -v- The Crown Prosecution Service and The Chief Constable of South Wales Police (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentHPE and IFD -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentNNG -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentAB and others -v- Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR39.2
- JudgmentMUB -v- Cambridgeshire County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentPWY -v- Cambridgeshire County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentAJX -v- North Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentRSN -v- Conwy County Borough Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentCXS -v- Spring Meadow Infant School (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-14anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentKMX -v- London Borough of Lambeth (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-14anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentNMC -v- Kent County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-14anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentCNP -v- London Borough of Hounslow (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentMFF -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentNational Crime Agency -v- Osema Najeem and Aml Makhluf (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asRule 39.2(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules
- JudgmentPXQ -v- Family Court at Preston (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentCXT -v- Ministry of Justice (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentAMS -v- Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Rule 39.2
- JudgmentNBH -v- Cambridgeshire County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentSocial Work England -v- MLN (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentPBN -v- Hertfordshire County Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 39.2
- JudgmentKL -v- Sandeep Prabhulal Shah (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.39.2