CPR Part 46
Costs special cases
Read CPR Part 46 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Judgments citing this Part 9
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentKMX -v- London Borough of Lambeth (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-14anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 46.5
- JudgmentTalmud Torah London Limited -v- Secretary of State for Housing and another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-12-04anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 46.24
- JudgmentBXB -v- Ministry of Defence and another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-05-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Part 46
- JudgmentAMX -v- Mrs Bhaveeta Shemar (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-03-25anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 46.9
- JudgmentAXYZ -v- Niall Hand (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-12-08anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 46.4
- JudgmentSXA -v- Zurich Insurance Plc, sucursal en Espana (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-12-22anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 46.4
- JudgmentJKL -v- Stefan Gerboc (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-01-27anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 46.9
- JudgmentEFX -v- Nikita Stuckey (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-12-31anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Part 46
- JudgmentNS -v- One Holding LTD T/A Visco Therapy (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-09-16anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Part 46
No guidance in our index cites this instrument by name. That is an absence in the cross-reference layer, not a statement that none exists — a document referring to it only as “Part 46” without naming its rulebook is deliberately not matched, because that reference is ambiguous across the three rulebooks.