CPR Part 52
Appeals
Read CPR Part 52 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Guidance that cites this 3
Judicial guidance and court guides containing an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one against its source.
- Guidance2025 judgment summariesupdated 2026-03-17
cited asCPR 52.1
…extended, and there was power to grant leave to appeal in such cases: CPR 52.1(4) applied to prevent CPR 52.3(2)(a) from excluding the right implici…
- Guidance2023 judgment summaries for the Commercial Courtupdated 2026-02-12
cited asCPR rules 52.6
…ch NIOC’s s. 67 application sought to challenge. The court considered CPR rules 52.6 and 52.18, and the decision in AIC Limited v Federal Airports Authori…
- GuidanceJudicial authority of court officers in the Court of Appeal (Civil Division)updated 2026-01-26
cited asCPR 52.24
…are specified in written authority from the Master of the Rolls under CPR 52.24 as follows: Determining applications for permission to amend appe…
Judgments citing this Part 21
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentBonne Terre and Hestview -v- RTM (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-05-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentBHO -v- Health Secretary and another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-03-10anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.52.12
- JudgmentLee Feldman and another -v- The Gambling Commission (opens the source site)2026-03-04
cited asCPR 52.12
- JudgmentCrypto Open Patent Alliance -v- Wright (order) (opens the source site)2024-12-20
cited asCPR 52.12
- JudgmentLW -v- London Borough of Islington (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-11-11anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.8
- JudgmentLW -v- London Borough of Islington (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-11-08anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.8
- JudgmentA Taxpayer -v- The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-04-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentCommittal for Contempt of Court: Wigan Borough Council -v- Brown (opens the source site)2024-01-23
cited asCPR rule 52.23
- JudgmentFXF -v- David John Donovan and another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-06-21anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentPiepenbrock -v- London School of Economics and Political Science (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-04-28anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentPK -v- Disclosure and Barring Service (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-02-23anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.6
- JudgmentSecretary of State for Work & Pensions -v- AT (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-02-06anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentA -v- The London Borough of Haringey (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-10-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentA -v- London Borough of Barnet (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-10-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentPXC -v- D & Ors (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-07-11anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentB9 -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-06-16anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentB9 -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-06-07anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentAll Answers LTD -v- MR W AND MS R (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-02-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.19
- JudgmentXXX -v- Camden London Borough Council (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-11-16anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.21
- JudgmentA -v- The Secretary of State (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2020-06-03anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 52.24
- JudgmentSchmalz and Jones -v- Moke International Ltd and other (opens the source site)2020-03-20
cited asCPR 52.4