CPR Part 6
Service of Documents
Read CPR Part 6 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Guidance that cites this 5
Judicial guidance and court guides containing an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one against its source.
- GuidanceJudgment summaries for the Commercial Courtupdated 2026-09-29
cited asCPR 6.33
…J held that the English court had jurisdiction. The claim fell within CPR 6.33(2B) and/or PD6B because the guarantees were governed by English law a…
- GuidanceOverturning inquestsupdated 2026-07-07
cited asCPR 6.16
…s missed an application for relief from sanctions or permission under CPR 6.16(1) to dispense with service of a claim form entirely will be required…
- Guidance2025 judgment summariesupdated 2026-03-17
cited asCPR r. 6.33
…to the SPA, that did not necessarily preclude his ability to rely on CPR r. 6.33(2B) – concerning the service of the claim form outside of the jurisdi…
- Guidance2023 judgment summaries for the Commercial Courtupdated 2026-02-12
cited asCPR 6.36
…t was not within the jurisdiction. Jurisdiction must be founded under CPR 6.36, including the requirement that England and Wales is the proper forum…
- Judiciary pageForeign Process Sectionupdated 2025-03-12
cited asCPR rr 6.40
…ocuments are to be served outside the United Kingdom are addressed at CPR rr 6.40 to 6.47 and PD6B. They include: service through foreign governments,…
Judgments citing this Part 16
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentCTY -v- LQS (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-08-17anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR rr 6.15
- JudgmentXB -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-05-11anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 6.15
- JudgmentPAL -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-12-22anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 6.14
- JudgmentCEY -v- Chief Constable of West Midlands Police and another (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-11-19anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR Part 6
- JudgmentUniversity and College Union -v- Person(s) Unknown (injunction) (opens the source site)2024-11-15
cited asCPR rr.6.36
- JudgmentUniversity and College Union -v- Person(s) Unknown (order) (opens the source site)2024-10-17
cited asCPR 6.36
- JudgmentQueen Mary University London -v- LSY and others (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-06-07anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.6.23
- JudgmentCommittal for Contempt of Court: RBT -v- YLA (opens the source site)2024-06-07
cited asCPR 6.15
- JudgmentBBG -v- Persons Unknown (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-02-21anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.6.15
- JudgmentDeutsche Bank AG -v- Ruschemalliance LLC (privacy order) (opens the source site)2023-09-08
cited asCPR 6.36
- JudgmentDeutsche Bank AG -v- Ruschemalliance LLC (privacy order) (opens the source site)2023-09-07
cited asCPR 6.36
- JudgmentCommittal for Contempt of Court: The Guinness Partnership Limited -v- Tierney (opens the source site)2022-12-12
cited asCPR 6.15
- JudgmentKRS -v- LST (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-09-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.6.16
- JudgmentAl-Aggad -v- Al-Aggad (domestic freezing order application) (opens the source site)2022-08-11
cited asCPR 6.2
- JudgmentDT -v- Vargas (anonymity) (opens the source site)2020-11-20anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR rule 6.37
- JudgmentSOJ -v- JAO (anonymity order published under CPR 39.2(5) (opens the source site)2019-09-27anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 6.15