CPR Part 82
Closed material procedure
Read CPR Part 82 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Judgments citing this Part 8
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentFEA -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2026-03-04anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asrule 82.13 of the CPR
- JudgmentCHD -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-12-23anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 82.21
- JudgmentValencia Waste Management -v- The Environment Agency (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-08-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 82.9
- JudgmentWZ -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-07-30anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.82.22
- JudgmentAB -v- Secretary of State for Defence and others (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-07-29anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR r.82.22
- JudgmentXB -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-12-21anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 82.13
- JudgmentMZX TZX RZX AZX MXX AXX -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-11-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 82.19
- JudgmentOH -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-11-12anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCPR 82.19
No guidance in our index cites this instrument by name. That is an absence in the cross-reference layer, not a statement that none exists — a document referring to it only as “Part 82” without naming its rulebook is deliberately not matched, because that reference is ambiguous across the three rulebooks.