CPR PD 32
Practice Direction 32
Read CPR PD 32 at the source →The text of this Practice Direction is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Judgments citing this Practice Direction 8
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentJoshua Moss -v- Asda Stores (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2025-12-22anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asPD32
- JudgmentLMN -v- Waltham Forest London Borough Council (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-01-18anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asPractice Direction 32
- JudgmentSK -v- London Borough of Lambeth (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-01-08anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asPD 32
- JudgmentMX -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-12-01anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asPD32
- JudgmentMX -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-12-01anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asPD32
- JudgmentGJA -v- The Sea Cadet Association (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2023-11-09anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asPractice Direction 32
- JudgmentDC KSO -v- The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2021-12-29anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asPractice Direction 32
- JudgmentPrior and others -v- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Minute of Order) (opens the source site)2021-06-21
cited asPractice Direction 32
No guidance in our index cites this instrument by name. That is an absence in the cross-reference layer, not a statement that none exists — a document referring to it only as “Part 32” without naming its rulebook is deliberately not matched, because that reference is ambiguous across the three rulebooks.