CrimPR Part 50
EXTRADITION
Read CrimPR Part 50 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Judgments citing this Part 4
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentABW -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2024-06-07anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCrim PR 50.22
- JudgmentRPX -v- Court of Bari (Italy) (opens the source site)2024-01-23
cited asCrim PR 50.22
- JudgmentRG -v- Judicial Court of the Judicial District in Aveiro, Portugal (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-06-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCrim PR 50.22
- JudgmentRG -v- Judicial Court of the Judicial District in Aveiro, Portugal (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-06-15anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asCrim PR 50.22
No guidance in our index cites this instrument by name. That is an absence in the cross-reference layer, not a statement that none exists — a document referring to it only as “Part 50” without naming its rulebook is deliberately not matched, because that reference is ambiguous across the three rulebooks.