FPR Part 25
Experts and Assessors
Read FPR Part 25 at the source →The text of this Part is not reproduced here. The rules are amended several times a year, and a cached copy of a procedural rule is exactly the kind of stale authority that costs a hearing.
Guidance that cites this 2
Judicial guidance and court guides containing an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one against its source.
- GuidanceUpdated Practice Guidance by the PFD: The use of Intermediaries, Lay Advocates and Cognitive Assessments in the Family Courtupdated 2025-12-18
cited asFPR Part 25
…should not be followed. 9. An intermediary is not an expert within FPR Part 25. Applications to instruct an intermediary should be made in accordanc…
- GuidanceLocal Practice Note: Ensuring adherence to the Public Law Outline in Londonupdated 2025-10-03
cited asFPR 2010 r.25.9
…whether expert evidence is necessary is a matter for the court. 28. FPR 2010 r.25.9(2) stipulates that the court will not direct the attendance of the ex…
Judgments citing this Part 1
Judgments and orders published on judiciary.uk whose text contains an explicit reference to this instrument. The matched text is shown so you can check each one in the judgment itself, which opens at its source. A judgment citing a rule is not a statement of what the rule says.
- JudgmentHertfordshire County Council -v- Mother & others (anonymity order) (opens the source site)2022-09-13anonymity or reporting restriction
cited asFPR r25.17